Re: Unexpected page allocation behavior on insert-only tables
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Unexpected page allocation behavior on insert-only tables |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 26120.1275283417@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Unexpected page allocation behavior on insert-only tables (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Unexpected page allocation behavior on insert-only tables
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
> This is an analyze-only scan? Why does analyze need to issue a
> relcache flush?
Directly: to cause other backends to pick up the updated pg_class row
(with new relpages/reltuples data).
Indirectly: to cause cached plans for the rel to be invalidated,
so that they can get replanned with updated pg_statistic entries.
So we can't just not have a relcache flush here. However, we
might be able to decouple targblock reset from the rest of it.
In particular, now that there's a distinction between smgr flush
and relcache flush, maybe we could associate targblock reset with
smgr flush (only) and arrange to not flush the smgr level during
ANALYZE --- basically, smgr flush would only be needed when truncating
or reassigning the relfilenode. I think this might work out nicely but
haven't chased the details.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: