Re: [PATCHES] log session end - again

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Right. And if we have sessionids we would want them logged there, I 
> think. And that would rule out anything based on xid or backend pid. 

Uh, what's wrong with backend pid?  Since we fork before we start doing
anything with a connection, it should surely be available soon enough
for the connection log message.

Larry's idea about combining PID and backend start time didn't sound too
unreasonable to me.
        regards, tom lane