Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> I think we can fix this by requiring that any multi-WAL-record actions
> that are in-progress when a checkpoint starts (at the REDO-pointer) must
> finish before the checkpoint record is written.
What happens if someone wants to start a new split while the checkpoint
is hanging fire?
regards, tom lane