Re: initdb and fsync
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: initdb and fsync |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 26056.1342215306@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: initdb and fsync (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: initdb and fsync
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote:
> I'm picking up this patch now. What I'm inclined to do about the -N
> business is to commit without that, so that we get a round of testing
> in the buildfarm and find out about any portability issues, but then
> change to use -N after a week or so. I agree that in the long run
> we don't want regression tests to run with fsyncs by default.
Committed without the -N in pg_regress (for now). I also stuck
sync_file_range into the backend's pg_flush_data --- it would be
interesting to hear measurements of whether that makes a noticeable
difference for CREATE DATABASE.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: