Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org> writes:
>> I'm confused. If this is exactly the same as EUC_JP, why do we need
>> any new code at all?
> I said *encoding schema" is same, not the contents (character set) is
> same. In another word, characters included in EUC_JP are not same as
> EUC_JIS_2004.
I'm still confused. If the set of characters is different, then surely
we need at least a different UTF8<->EUC_JIS_2004 conversion function?
regards, tom lane