On 1/11/17 5:27 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> The main area of "design doubt" remains the implementation of the
> recovery_target parameter set. Are we happy with the user interface
> choices in the patch, given the understanding that the situation was
> more comple than at first thought?
Could you summarize the current proposal(s)?
Personally, I don't immediately see the need to change anything from the
parameter names that I currently see in recovery.conf.sample.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services