Re: wal_sender_delay is still required?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: wal_sender_delay is still required?
Дата
Msg-id 25969.1291648101@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на wal_sender_delay is still required?  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: wal_sender_delay is still required?  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> writes:
> Walsender doesn't need the periodic wakeups anymore, thanks to
> the latch feature. So wal_sender_delay is basically useless now.
> How about dropping wal_sender_delay or increasing the default
> value?

If we don't need it, we should remove it.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump
Следующее
От: Merlin Moncure
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Suggesting a libpq addition