Re: [BUGS] BUG #6572: The example of SPI_execute is bogus

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [BUGS] BUG #6572: The example of SPI_execute is bogus
Дата
Msg-id 25939.1333551641@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: [BUGS] BUG #6572: The example of SPI_execute is bogus  (Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
umi.tanuki@gmail.com writes:
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/spi-spi-execute.html

> ===
> SPI_execute("INSERT INTO foo SELECT * FROM bar", false, 5);
> will allow at most 5 rows to be inserted into the table.
> ===

> This seems not true unless I'm missing something.

Hmm ... that did work as described, until we broke it :-(.  This is an
oversight in the 9.0 changes that added separate ModifyTuple nodes to
plan trees.  ModifyTuple doesn't return after each updated row, unless
there's a RETURNING clause; which means that the current_tuple_count
check logic in ExecutePlan() no longer stops execution as intended.

Given the lack of complaints since 9.0, maybe we should not fix this
but just redefine the new behavior as being correct?  But it seems
mighty inconsistent that the tuple limit would apply if you have
RETURNING but not when you don't.  In any case, the ramifications
are wider than one example in the SPI docs.

Thoughts?
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Speed dblink using alternate libpq tuple storage
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: bugfix for cursor arguments in named notation