Re: compressed protocol

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: compressed protocol
Дата
Msg-id 2590.1157330787@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: compressed protocol  (Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>)
Ответы Re: compressed protocol  (Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org>)
Список pgsql-general
Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> zeljko <zeljko@holobit.net> writes:
>>> Is there any plans (or somebody already working on) to see compressed
>>> protocol in 8.2 ?
>>
>> Why bother?  Run your session through an ssh tunnel and ask it to
>> compress.

> Wouldn't that add extra libssl overhead?

Well, (a) if you're sending your data over a nonlocal network (and over
a LAN, you don't need compression), you probably want some encryption.
(b) I believe there's a "null cipher" mode for SSL if you truly don't
need encryption.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ron Johnson
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: compressed protocol
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Syntax for converting double to a timestamp