Re: AUTOCOMMIT currently doesn't handle non-transactional commands very well

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: AUTOCOMMIT currently doesn't handle non-transactional commands very well
Дата
Msg-id 25886.1153319903@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на AUTOCOMMIT currently doesn't handle non-transactional commands very well  (Gregory Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
Ответы Re: AUTOCOMMIT currently doesn't handle non-transactional commands very well  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Gregory Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
> One possible criticism is that a user that manually does BEGIN; CLUSTER
> DATABASE; ROLLBACK; won't be warned that the cluster will not be undoable.

s/possible criticism/deal-breaker/ ... you can't possibly think that the
above would be acceptable.  It'd be worse than "won't be undoable"; it'd
probably corrupt your database.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Progress bar updates
Следующее
От: Joshua Reich
Дата:
Сообщение: Patch process?