Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 258297.1684681058@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg (Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@toroid.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@toroid.org> writes:
> At 2023-05-20 23:21:57 -0400, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
>> I thought the plan was to also rename the libpq "gssdeleg" connection
>> parameter and so on? I can look into that tomorrow, if nobody beats
>> me to it.
> I was trying the change to see if it would be better to name it
> "gssdelegate" instead (as in delegate on one side, and accept the
> delegation on the other), but decided that "gssdelegation=enable"
> reads better than "gssdelegate=enable".
Yeah, agreed.
> Here's the diff.
Thanks for doing that legwork! I found a couple other places where
"deleg" had escaped notice, and changed the lot. Watching the
buildfarm now ...
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: