Re: [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 25809.1506348877@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use? (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use?
|
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 09/24/2017 07:06 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> So I think we should just stop with the blacklist test for v10,
>> and then see if we still get complaints (and exactly what they're
>> about) so that we can judge how much more work the problem deserves.
>> It's still ahead of where we were in previous releases, and ahead of
>> where we'd be if we end up reverting the patch altogether.
> That's pretty much what I was saying.
Oh ... I did not think we were on the same page, because your patch
didn't include removal of the same-transaction heuristic. It'd be
sensible to do that as a separate patch, though, to make it easier
to put back if we decide we do want it.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: