Re: Why are absolute paths considered a security risk?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why are absolute paths considered a security risk? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 25797.1046219481@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Why are absolute paths considered a security risk? (Hadley Willan <hadley.willan@deeperdesign.co.nz>) |
Ответы |
Re: Why are absolute paths considered a security risk?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Hadley Willan <hadley.willan@deeperdesign.co.nz> writes: > The documentation (7.2.1) mentions that allowing absolute paths when > creating a db is a security risk and is off by default. > However, it seems fairly hard to exploit, and I was wondering if anybody > has any examples of how much of a risk this is? > Reason I ask is we're considering turning them on in our server and want > to consider these risks. The difficulty is that someone who is allowed to create databases (but isn't necessarily a superuser) will be able to cause the backend to scribble in any directory that the postgres user has write access to. The potential damage is somewhat limited since "base/DBOID" gets tacked onto the user-specified string, and the user has little if any control over the DBOID part. Still, it's a risk. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: