Re: Why are absolute paths considered a security risk?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Why are absolute paths considered a security risk? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 25797.1046219481@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Why are absolute paths considered a security risk? (Hadley Willan <hadley.willan@deeperdesign.co.nz>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Why are absolute paths considered a security risk?
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Hadley Willan <hadley.willan@deeperdesign.co.nz> writes:
> The documentation (7.2.1) mentions that allowing absolute paths when
> creating a db is a security risk and is off by default.
> However, it seems fairly hard to exploit, and I was wondering if anybody
> has any examples of how much of a risk this is?
> Reason I ask is we're considering turning them on in our server and want
> to consider these risks.
The difficulty is that someone who is allowed to create databases (but
isn't necessarily a superuser) will be able to cause the backend to
scribble in any directory that the postgres user has write access to.
The potential damage is somewhat limited since "base/DBOID" gets tacked
onto the user-specified string, and the user has little if any control
over the DBOID part. Still, it's a risk.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: