Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> This is only for the 8.1.X wording, not the newer HEAD wording. I
> thought the 8.1.X wording was old. Why is it wrong? Feel free to
> revert it.
Oh, my mistake, I was thinking you had reverted the newer wording.
Still, it seems wrong to me, because omitting "only" essentially
turns the statement into a no-op. We wouldn't bother to say anything
if you could set the parameter whenever you wanted.
We could back-patch the newer wording if you want a change.
regards, tom lane