Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Honestly, I would prefer that we push a patch that has been thoroughly
> reviewed and in which we have more confidence, so that we can push
> without a GUC. This means mark in CF as needs-review, then some other
> developer reviews it and marks it as ready-for-committer.
FWIW, that was the point I was trying to make as well ;-)
regards, tom lane