Re: query not using index for descending records?

Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone.bigpanda.com> writes:
> Yeah, that's what I figured.  I thought it might be useful for people to
> play with though since at least for the integer/float types writing C
> versions of the comparitors is easy. I was thinking for real it'd be nice
> to be able to use the normal comparitor but invert the return value as
> necessary rather than providing two functions, but I didn't look at what
> that would take.

I think the C versions should be written to just call the "normal"
comparators and negate the result, which'll make them one-liner
boilerplate.  It's just a matter of grinding out all that boilerplate ...
        regards, tom lane