Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch
Дата
Msg-id 25731.1018898660@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Anyone object if I turn off public read access to
>> pg_largeobject?

> Please do whatever you can to tighten it up. I thought we needed to keep
> read access so people could get to their large objects, but maybe not.

Yeah, right after sending that message I remembered that we had already
discussed this and concluded it would break clients :-(.

There's really no security for large objects anyway, since if you know
or can guess the OID of one you can read (or write!) it regardless.
Not much point in turning off read access on pg_largeobject unless we
rethink that ...
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Array Iterator functions
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Operators and schemas