Re: (SETOF) RECORD AS complex_type
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: (SETOF) RECORD AS complex_type |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 25622.1167262616@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: (SETOF) RECORD AS complex_type (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: (SETOF) RECORD AS complex_type
Re: (SETOF) RECORD AS complex_type |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 06:22:17PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The problem with that is that "AS foo" already has a meaning, and it's
>> not this one.
> How about "AS (foo)" ?
What if you want to specify an alias? This doesn't work:
FROM myverylongfunctionname(...) AS alias(typename)
because, again, that syntax already has a meaning.
You could possibly do something with a cast:
FROM CAST(myfunc(...) AS typename) [ AS alias ]
This is at least syntactically OK. Not sure what the implementation
issues might be.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: