Re: [RFC] Extend namespace of valid guc names
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [RFC] Extend namespace of valid guc names |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 2562.1378493313@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [RFC] Extend namespace of valid guc names (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [RFC] Extend namespace of valid guc names
Re: [RFC] Extend namespace of valid guc names |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2013-09-06 10:13:23 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Well, if you feel an absolute compulsion to make them consistent, I'd
>> go with making SET disallow creation of variables with names the file
>> parser wouldn't recognize. But why is it such a bad thing if SET can
>> do that?
> Also, ALTER SYSTEM SET is going to need a similar restriction as well,
> otherwise the server won't restart although the GUCs pass validation...
Well, sure, but I would think that ALTER SYSTEM SET should be constrained
to only set known GUCs, not invent new ones on the fly.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: