Re: Multicolumn index corruption on 8.4 beta 2

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Multicolumn index corruption on 8.4 beta 2
Дата
Msg-id 25575.1244573459@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Multicolumn index corruption on 8.4 beta 2  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> It doesn't.  But what I don't trust, and the *first* place I'd look for 
> problems, is whether the OS flushes *all* dirty buffers to disk in the 
> event the application gets killed.

Why wouldn't you trust it?  The sort of thing you seem to be thinking
about would require tracking which process(es) wrote each dirty buffer
and then going back and dropping selected dirty buffers when a process
exits abnormally.  I can hardly imagine any OS wishing to do that.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Not quite a security hole in internal_in
Следующее
От: "Kolb, Harald (NSN - DE/Munich)"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: postmaster recovery and automatic restart suppression