Re: Should 'sum(mvf)' read 'sum(mcv)'...?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Should 'sum(mvf)' read 'sum(mcv)'...? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 255694.1661173111@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Should 'sum(mvf)' read 'sum(mcv)'...? (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Should 'sum(mvf)' read 'sum(mcv)'...?
|
| Список | pgsql-docs |
Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 11:02:04PM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
>> It appears the above sentence is referring to the "(1 - sum(mvf))" portion
>> of the formula, however I am not sure what "mvf" is referring to
>> there...shouldn't it be "(1 - sum(mcv))" in order to match what the
>> explanatory sentence is saying?
> It should be mcf, ie. Most Common Frequencies. It looks like a very old typo
> that survived until now.
I don't think it's a typo exactly, but an odd abbreviation for "Most
common Values' Frequencies". (Summing the MCVs themselves isn't
sensible; they might not even be numeric.)
I'd vote for replacing mvf in both places with something a bit more
spelled-out, perhaps "mcv_freqs".
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: