Re: ruleutils with pretty-print option

Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de> writes:
> I recoded the stuff as Tom recommended, leaving the non-pretty version
> function names as they used to be, inventing new pg_get_XXXX_ext
> functions for the extended stuff, and pushing the code down into
> pg_get_XXXX_worker functions when needed. We now need the additional
> prototype include patch from builtins.h.

Applied with some editorializing.  In particular, I don't believe the
original did the right thing with (a - (b - c)).

            regards, tom lane