Re: Database size Vs performance degradation
| От | Tom Lane | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Database size Vs performance degradation | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 25537.1217430316@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст | 
| Ответ на | Re: Database size Vs performance degradation ("Dave North" <DNorth@signiant.com>) | 
| Список | pgsql-performance | 
"Dave North" <DNorth@signiant.com> writes:
> From: Richard Huxton [mailto:dev@archonet.com]
>> Well, that's pretty much the definition of bloat. Are you sure you're
>> vacuuming enough?
> DN: Well, the auto-vac is kicking off pretty darn frequently...around
> once every 2 minutes.  However, you just made me think of the obvious -
> is it actually doing anything?!  The app is pretty darn write intensive
> so I wonder if it's actually able to vacuum the tables?
IIRC, the default autovac parameters in 8.1 were pretty darn
unaggressive.  You should also check for long-running transactions
that might be preventing vacuum from removing recently-dead rows.
One of the reasons for updating off 8.1 is that finding out what autovac
is really doing is hard :-(.  I think it does log, but at level DEBUG2
or so, which means that the only way to find out is to accept a huge
amount of useless chatter in the postmaster log.  Newer releases have
a saner logging scheme.
            regards, tom lane
		
	В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: