Re: VACUUM PARALLEL option vs. max_parallel_maintenance_workers

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: VACUUM PARALLEL option vs. max_parallel_maintenance_workers
Дата
Msg-id 25530a0c-1b6d-d6ed-1386-38a8a08bfd68@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: VACUUM PARALLEL option vs. max_parallel_maintenance_workers  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: VACUUM PARALLEL option vs. max_parallel_maintenance_workers
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2020-09-26 07:32, Amit Kapila wrote:
> This is exactly my feeling too. But how about changing documentation a
> bit as proposed above [1] to make it precise.
> 
> [1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1LQWXS_4RwLo%2BWT7jusGnBkUvXO73xQOCsydWLYBpLBEg%40mail.gmail.com

Yes, making the documentation more precise would be good.  Right now, 
it's a bit confusing and unclear (using phrases like "based on"). 
Someone who wants to the the VACUUM PARALLEL option presumably  wants 
precise control, so specifying the exact rules would be desirable.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amul Sul
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Disable WAL logging to speed up data loading
Следующее
От: Laurenz Albe
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Add session statistics to pg_stat_database