Re: FailedAssertion("pd_idx == pinfo->nparts", File: "execPartition.c", Line: 1689)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: FailedAssertion("pd_idx == pinfo->nparts", File: "execPartition.c", Line: 1689)
Дата
Msg-id 2550497.1596651719@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: FailedAssertion("pd_idx == pinfo->nparts", File: "execPartition.c", Line: 1689)  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: FailedAssertion("pd_idx == pinfo->nparts", File: "execPartition.c", Line: 1689)  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Re: FailedAssertion("pd_idx == pinfo->nparts", File: "execPartition.c", Line: 1689)  (Andy Fan <zhihui.fan1213@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 1:30 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I'm strongly tempted to convert the trailing Assert to an actual
>> test-and-elog, too, but didn't do so here.

> I was thinking about that, too. +1 for taking that step.

Will do.

In the longer term, it's annoying that we have no test methodology
for this other than "manually set a breakpoint here".  If we're going
to allow plan-relevant DDL changes to happen with less than full table
lock, I think we need to improve that.  I spent a little bit of time
just now trying to build an isolationtester case for this, and failed
completely.  So I wonder if we can create some sort of test module that
allows capture of a plan tree and then execution of that plan tree later
(even after relcache inval would normally have forced replanning).
Obviously that could not be a normal SQL-accessible feature, because
some types of invals would make the plan completely wrong, but for
testing purposes it'd be mighty helpful to check that a stale plan
still works.

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
Сообщение: pg_rewind is not crash safe
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: recovering from "found xmin ... from before relfrozenxid ..."