Re: PQ versions request message
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PQ versions request message |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 25446.1126211268@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: PQ versions request message (James William Pye <pgsql@jwp.name>) |
| Ответы |
Re: PQ versions request message
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
James William Pye <pgsql@jwp.name> writes:
> The point is to give client authors the ability to authoritatively
> resolve ambiguity that may exist in multiversion supporting clients and
> to do so without any version specific code(or at a minimum wrt older
> servers) or fingerprinting of any sort.
Had we had such a facility from the beginning, it would indeed have that
benefit. But unless you are going to start out by dropping client-side
support for all extant server versions, you will not get any such
benefit; you'll still need retry code. So I still think this isn't
really worth the trouble it would take to implement.
Also, you keep referring to caching the result on the client side and
re-using it across multiple connections --- but you can do that now,
so why is that an argument in favor?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: