Re: Checkpoint Tuning Question
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Checkpoint Tuning Question |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 25426.1247078683@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Checkpoint Tuning Question (Dan Armbrust <daniel.armbrust.list@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Checkpoint Tuning Question
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Dan Armbrust <daniel.armbrust.list@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Well, you could increase both those settings so as to put the
>> checkpoints further apart, and/or increase checkpoint_completion_target
>> to spread the checkpoint I/O over a larger fraction of the cycle.
> Wouldn't increasing the length between checkpoints result in the
> checkpoint process taking even longer to complete?
You don't really care how long it takes. What you want is for it not to
be chewing a bigger fraction of your I/O bandwidth than you can spare.
Hence, you want it to take longer. Trying to shorten it is just going
to make the spike worse.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: