Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6

Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2019-05-07 12:07:37 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The number of deadlock failures is kind of annoying, so I'd rather remove
>> the tests from HEAD sooner than later.  What issues around that do you
>> think remain that these tests would be helpful for?

> I was wondering about
> https://postgr.es/m/20190430151735.wi52sxjvxsjvaxxt%40alap3.anarazel.de
> but perhaps it's too unlikely to break anything the tests would detect
> though.

Since we don't allow REINDEX CONCURRENTLY on system catalogs, I'm not
seeing any particular overlap there ...

            regards, tom lane