Re: SE-PostgreSQL Specifications

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: SE-PostgreSQL Specifications
Дата
Msg-id 25372.1248534397@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: SE-PostgreSQL Specifications  (Sam Mason <sam@samason.me.uk>)
Ответы Re: SE-PostgreSQL Specifications  ("A.M." <agentm@themactionfaction.com>)
Re: SE-PostgreSQL Specifications  (Sam Mason <sam@samason.me.uk>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Sam Mason <sam@samason.me.uk> writes:
> Yes, that seems reasonable.  The fact that you're still talking about
> "confined users" is slightly worrying and would seem to imply that
> there is still a superuser/normal user divide--it's probably just a
> terminology thing though.

There had better still be superusers.  Or do you want the correctness
of your backups to depend on whether your SELinux policy is correct?
The first time somebody loses critical data because SELinux suppressed
it from their pg_dump output, they're going to be on the warpath.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: autogenerating headers & bki stuff
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Non-blocking communication between a frontend and a backend (pqcomm)