Re: do {} while (0) nitpick
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: do {} while (0) nitpick |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 25358.1588368731@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: do {} while (0) nitpick (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: do {} while (0) nitpick
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> writes:
> On 4/30/20 9:52 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 09:51:10PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Yeah. I'd call these actual bugs, and perhaps even back-patch worthy.
>> Agreed. Those semicolons could easily create bugs.
> +1. The patch looks good to me.
Grepping showed me that there were some not-do-while macros that
also had trailing semicolons. These seem just as broken, so I
fixed 'em all.
There are remaining instances of this antipattern in the flex-generated
scanners, which we can't do anything about; and in pl/plperl/ppport.h,
which we shouldn't do anything about because that's upstream-generated
code. (I wonder though if there's a newer version available.)
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: