Re: BUG: endless lseek(.., SEEK_END) from select queries on x64 builds

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: BUG: endless lseek(.., SEEK_END) from select queries on x64 builds
Дата
Msg-id 2529.1361636073@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: BUG: endless lseek(.., SEEK_END) from select queries on x64 builds  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> writes:
> You can take the query, replace the ? parameter markers with $1, $2, and
> so forth, and explain it with psql like this:

> prepare foo (text) as select * from mytable where id = $1;
> explain analyze execute foo ('foo');

> On 9.2, though, this will explain the specific plan for those
> parameters, so it might not be any different from what you already
> EXPLAINed.

You can tell whether you're getting a generic or custom plan by noting
whether the explain output contains $n symbols or the values you put in.
In 9.2, the first five attempts will always produce custom plans, but
on the sixth and subsequent attempts you will get a generic plan, if
the plancache logic decides that it's not getting any benefit out of
custom plans.  Here's a trivial example:

regression=# prepare foo(int) as select * from tenk1 where unique1 = $1;
PREPARE
regression=# explain execute foo(42);
                                 QUERY PLAN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Index Scan using tenk1_unique1 on tenk1  (cost=0.29..8.30 rows=1 width=244)
   Index Cond: (unique1 = 42)
(2 rows)

regression=# explain execute foo(42);
                                 QUERY PLAN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Index Scan using tenk1_unique1 on tenk1  (cost=0.29..8.30 rows=1 width=244)
   Index Cond: (unique1 = 42)
(2 rows)

regression=# explain execute foo(42);
                                 QUERY PLAN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Index Scan using tenk1_unique1 on tenk1  (cost=0.29..8.30 rows=1 width=244)
   Index Cond: (unique1 = 42)
(2 rows)

regression=# explain execute foo(42);
                                 QUERY PLAN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Index Scan using tenk1_unique1 on tenk1  (cost=0.29..8.30 rows=1 width=244)
   Index Cond: (unique1 = 42)
(2 rows)

regression=# explain execute foo(42);
                                 QUERY PLAN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Index Scan using tenk1_unique1 on tenk1  (cost=0.29..8.30 rows=1 width=244)
   Index Cond: (unique1 = 42)
(2 rows)

regression=# explain execute foo(42);
                                 QUERY PLAN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Index Scan using tenk1_unique1 on tenk1  (cost=0.29..8.30 rows=1 width=244)
   Index Cond: (unique1 = $1)
(2 rows)

It's switched to a generic plan after observing that the custom plans
weren't any cheaper.  Once that happens, subsequent attempts will use
the generic plan.  (Of course, in a scenario where the custom plans do
provide a benefit, it'll keep using those.)

            regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG: endless lseek(.., SEEK_END) from select queries on x64 builds
Следующее
От: Jeff Janes
Дата:
Сообщение: Are bitmap index scans slow to start?