Re: [HACKERS] Something is rotten in publication drop

Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> If there are no new insights, I plan to proceed with the attached patch
> tomorrow.  This leaves the existing view and function alone, adds
> pg_relation_is_publishable() and uses that in psql.

Hm, patch looks okay, but while eyeballing it I started to wonder
why in the world is pg_get_publication_tables marked prosecdef?
If that has any consequences at all, they're probably bad.
There are exactly no other built-in functions that have that set.
        regards, tom lane