Re: pgsql: Add suport for server-side LZ4 base backup compression.
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pgsql: Add suport for server-side LZ4 base backup compression. |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 2523849.1644725570@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: pgsql: Add suport for server-side LZ4 base backup compression. (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pgsql: Add suport for server-side LZ4 base backup compression.
Re: pgsql: Add suport for server-side LZ4 base backup compression. |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 05:16:03PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think adding an explicit PGAC_PATH_PROGS would be worth the cycles.
> Well, this somebody is I, and the buildfarm did not blow up on any of
> that so that looked rather fine.
Eh? copperhead for one is failing for exactly this reason:
Bailout called. Further testing stopped: failed to execute command "lz4 -d -m
/home/pgbf/buildroot/HEAD/pgsql.build/src/bin/pg_verifybackup/tmp_check/t_008_untar_primary_data/backup/server-backup/base.tar.lz4":
Nosuch file or directory
> Adding a few cycles for this check
> is fine by me. What do you think of the attached?
Looks OK as far as it goes ... but do we need anything on the
MSVC side?
Also, I can't help wondering why we have both GZIP_PROGRAM and GZIP
variables. I suppose that's a separate issue though.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: