Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance tweak

"Merlin Moncure" <merlin.moncure@rcsonline.com> writes:
>> Will have performance #s up in a bit.

> I have a couple of cpu-bound performance tests that I just ran with and
> without the patch.  Everything is ran with n=1 until volatile issue is
> sorted out but so far I am not seeing any performance
> improvement...

Hm, what were the tests exactly?  Offhand I'd expect something like a
SELECT COUNT(*) on a large but not-too-wide table to show noticeable
improvement.
        regards, tom lane