Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Bort, Paul wrote:
>> [ 1000 vs 1024 ]
> But in this case it's not practical.
Maybe I'm missing something, but I thought it was fairly common to use
"k" for 1000, "K" for 1024, etc (mnemonic: upper case for the larger
multiplier). So I'd vote for accepting "KB" rather than "kB" ...
regards, tom lane