Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> Yes, it seems to have done just that. The comment for
> ForwardFsyncRequest is a few bricks short of a load too:
> ...
> Line 2 seems to have been mechanically changed from "background
> writer" to "checkpointer", but of course it should still say
> "background writer" in this case.
Yeah, found that one already (it's probably my fault).
Will see about fixing the stats in a separate patch. I just wanted to
know if the issue had been dealt with in some non-obvious fashion.
regards, tom lane