Re: bugfix: --echo-hidden is not supported by \sf statements
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: bugfix: --echo-hidden is not supported by \sf statements |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 25150.1361616954@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: bugfix: --echo-hidden is not supported by \sf statements (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: bugfix: --echo-hidden is not supported by \sf statements
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
> 2013/2/23 Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>:
>> Why is that? lookup_function_oid() only collects the oid to pass to
>> get_create_function_cmd(), why not just issue one query to the backend?
>> And use PSQLexec() to boot and get --echo-hidden, etc, for free? And
>> eliminate the one-off error handling for just this case?
> yes, we can do it. There is only one issue
> routines for parsing function signature in regproc and regprocedure
> should be updated - and I would to get some agreement than I start to
> do modify core.
Uh ... you seem to be asking for a blank check to modify regprocedure,
which is unlikely to be forthcoming. Why do you think these things need
to be changed, and to what?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: