Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 25150.1188849627@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
| Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Of course, that's 70% of -advocacy, which by nature is going to be the
>> subset of the community most interested in this change and least
>> interested in the ensuing costs.
> It seems there were a significant number of people with swag who will
> pay the cost somehow.
That's adopting exactly the view I thought it was, that only directly
marketing-related costs matter. Again, this seems to be considering
only advocacy-related concerns.
I'll confine my reply to one point: do you have any idea what will
happen if I try to change the default PGDATA location on Red Hat
from /var/lib/pgsql to something else?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: