Re: Hard limit on WAL space used (because PANIC sucks)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Hard limit on WAL space used (because PANIC sucks)
Дата
Msg-id 25149.1370624382@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Hard limit on WAL space used (because PANIC sucks)  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> writes:
> On 07.06.2013 19:33, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Not only is that a horrible layering/modularity violation, but surely
>> LockBuffer can have no idea how much WAL space will be needed.

> It can be just a conservative guess, like, 32KB. That should be enough 
> for almost all WAL-logged operations. The only exception that comes to 
> mind is a commit record, which can be arbitrarily large, when you have a 
> lot of subtransactions or dropped/created relations.

What happens when several updates are occurring concurrently?
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES FOR ROLE is broken
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES FOR ROLE is broken