Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 25130.1128628658@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort?
Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes:
> Indeed, one of the things on my list is to remove all the lseeks in
> favour of pread. Halving the number of kernel calls has got to be worth
> something right? Portability is an issue ofcourse...
Being sure that it's not a pessimization is another issue. I note that
glibc will emulate these functions if the kernel doesn't have them;
which means you could be replacing one kernel call with three.
And I don't think autoconf has any way to determine whether a libc
function represents a native kernel call or not ...
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: