Re: ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES FOR ROLE is broken

Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> * Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
>> Essentially the argument for allowing this without a permissions check
>> is "I'm not really doing anything to the schema, just preconfiguring the
>> rights that will be attached to a new object if I later (successfully)
>> create one in this schema".

> Makes sense to me; if we were going to do something, I'd say a warning
> would be better, but I'm alright with nothing too.

Hm.  Throwing a NOTICE saying "btw, this won't be of any value until the
user has CREATE rights in that schema" might be a reasonable compromise.
        regards, tom lane