Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 25084.1157385589@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Without a reply from Peter, I have to assume the patch is valid.
> To make it more explicit: I think the patch is stupid, but if someone
> wants to review it, go ahead. But I am not comfortable with the "if no
> one objects, I'll just commit it" mode that is sometimes going on. Has
> anyone actually tested the patch?
Perhaps more to the point: a refactorization patch is all about beauty
in the eye of the beholder. If Peter, the original author of the guc
code, thinks that it's a disimprovement, I think it's a hard argument
to make that the patch should go in anyway.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: