Re: pg_class -> reltuples?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: pg_class -> reltuples?
Дата
Msg-id 25059.1015548874@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_class -> reltuples?  (Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org>)
Ответы Re: pg_class -> reltuples?  (Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org> writes:
> I have no problem making restrictions on data types for portability, but
> at least we should be consistent:

We *are* consistent.  int8 is not used in the system catalogs, and where
it is used, the system will continue to function if it's implemented as
a 32-bit datatype.  (At least, things still worked the last time I tried
turning off HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT.  If someone broke it since then, it
needs to be fixed.)
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tatsuo Ishii
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Point in time recovery: recreating relation files
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCHES] system catalog relation of a table and a serial sequence