Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query
От | YUriy Zhuravlev |
---|---|
Тема | Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2503610.GK2PORpHW9@dinodell обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query
Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello. Currently using nodeToString and stringToNode you can not pass a full plan. In this regard, what is the plan to fix it? Or in the under task parallel query does not have such a problem? > This turns out not to be straightforward to code, because we > don't have a generic plan tree walker, I have an inner development. I am using python analyzing header files and generates a universal walker (parser, paths ,executer and etc trees), as well as the serializer and deserializer to jsonb. Maybe I should publish this code? Thanks. -- YUriy Zhuravlev Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: