Re: BUG #16583: merge join on tables with different DB collation behind postgres_fdw fails

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: BUG #16583: merge join on tables with different DB collation behind postgres_fdw fails
Дата
Msg-id 2501728.1632578373@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: BUG #16583: merge join on tables with different DB collation behind postgres_fdw fails  (Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: BUG #16583: merge join on tables with different DB collation behind postgres_fdw fails  (Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com>)
Re: BUG #16583: merge join on tables with different DB collation behind postgres_fdw fails  (Jeremy Schneider <schnjere@amazon.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 4:11 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Longer-term, it seems like we really have to be able to represent
>> the notion of a remote column that has an "unknown" collation (that
>> is, one that doesn't match any local collation, or at least is not
>> known to do so).

> +1

> In addition, a) we should detect whether local “default” matches
> remote “default”,

If we had a way to do that, most of the problem here wouldn't exist.
I don't believe we can do it reliably.  (Maybe we could put it on
the user to tell us, say via a foreign-server property?)

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Etsuro Fujita
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #16583: merge join on tables with different DB collation behind postgres_fdw fails
Следующее
От: Mark Dilger
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Fixing WAL instability in various TAP tests