Re: Index AM change proposals, redux
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Index AM change proposals, redux |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 24934.1207866632@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Index AM change proposals, redux (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Index AM change proposals, redux
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>>> Note that we'll need to add candidate match support to the regular index
>>> scan API as well for that.
>>
>> [ confused... ] Thought you'd done that in this patch?
> No, I only modified the bitmap scan API.
Okay. I applied what you'd done (with minor revisions), but we'll have
to fix up the regular indexscan API before anything can be done about
@@@. I'll take a look at that part tomorrow.
Teodor, do you have any thoughts about exactly how you'd fix @@@ ?
I suppose that the recheck-need is not really a property of specific
tuples, but of a particular query, for that case. Where would you
want to detect that?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: