Re: Problem with triggers
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Problem with triggers |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 24930.1276658060@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Problem with triggers (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Problem with triggers
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@gmail.com> writes:
> On 06/15/2010 02:01 PM, Sid wrote:
>> I am writing trigger function for validating values inserted into table. The
>> goal is to print user friendly messages when inserted value is wrong.
>> My question is: why do I get information about too long value before trigger
>> fires?
> The database is beating you to the validation.
People try this every few months :-(, but it's basically a dead-end idea.
A large majority of the things you might want to report an error for are
going to be rejected by the datatype input functions for the column
datatypes --- for example, you're not going to be able to "print a user
friendly message" on a bad timestamp, because that will be noticed long
before any trigger gets to fire.
You can either decide that the built-in error messages aren't so awful
after all, or do your data validation on the client side.
Or I guess you could lobotomize the database completely by making all
your fields be unlimited-length varchar so that there's no interesting
checking to be done. But you really, really don't want to go there.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: