Re: Permissions within a function
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: Permissions within a function
Дата
Msg-id
24927.1103323477@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Re: Permissions within a function (Thomas Hallgren)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Permissions within a function Thomas Hallgren <thhal@mailblocks.com>
Re: Permissions within a function Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>
Re: Permissions within a function Thomas Hallgren <thhal@mailblocks.com>
Re: Permissions within a function Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Permissions within a function vamsi krishna <vamsi.krishnak@gmail.com>
Re: Permissions within a function Thomas Hallgren <thhal@mailblocks.com>
Re: Permissions within a function Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Permissions within a function Thomas Hallgren <thhal@mailblocks.com>
Re: Permissions within a function Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: Permissions within a function Thomas Hallgren <thhal@mailblocks.com>
Re: Permissions within a function Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Permissions within a function Thomas Hallgren <thhal@mailblocks.com>
Re: Permissions within a function Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Permissions within a function Thomas Hallgren <thhal@mailblocks.com>
Re: Permissions within a function Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Thomas Hallgren writes: > This is all about access to the java class images, i.e. the actual byte > codes that make out the Java functions that will execute. Class files > are normally grouped into archives called jar files (zip format > essentially) and the SQL 2003 standard for server side Java defines > stored procedures for loading, replacing, and removing such jars. I've > implemented them as functions. A loaded jar is unpacked and stored as > individual class files in a table. AFAICS you are choosing to do things in the hardest possible way, on the basis of completely unfounded suppositions about performance gains. I recommend the KISS principle. Leave the jar files as jars and let the Java runtime system manage them. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления