Re: Shouldn't this be an error?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Shouldn't this be an error? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 24914.980786679@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Shouldn't this be an error? (Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Shouldn't this be an error?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com> writes:
> Shouldn't this insert fail? This is 7.0.3.
> template1=# create table foo(x int,y varchar(10),z datetime);
> CREATE
> template1=# insert into foo(x,y,z) values(1,'asdf');
> INSERT 19222 1
We've always allowed trailing columns to be omitted, whether a column
name list is specified or not. This is not per spec --- SQL92 and SQL99
both say that all the columns must be provided --- but I'm rather
hesitant to enforce the spec's stricter rule at this point. Seems like
it'd probably break some existing apps.
A compromise position would be to allow dropping trailing columns only
when the column name list is omitted.
Comments?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: