Re: new vacuum is slower for small tables

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: new vacuum is slower for small tables
Дата
Msg-id 24912.1228749203@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: new vacuum is slower for small tables  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> In the end, it would be better if this function was not called at all
> for user-invoked vacuum, and have autovacuum handle it.  However, that
> doesn't work for people who disable autovacuum.

A possible variant on that is to invoke it only in database-wide
vacuums, ie not when you specify a single target table.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: new vacuum is slower for small tables
Следующее
От: ohp@pyrenet.fr
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: cvs head initdb hangs on unixware